NEWS RELEASES - 1999

Back to 1999 News Releases

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Contact:

Meg Mullery

202.342.8439

ANOTHER WIN FOR U.S. STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCERS AND UNIONS

Hefty Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Assessed on Dumped and Subsidized
Imports of Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from Eight Countries

(Washington, D.C.) - Last Thursday's (May 20, 1999) announcement by the Department of Commerce of antidumping and countervailing duties ranging up to a hefty 60% on imports from eight countries of stainless steel sheet and strip, the industry's largest product line, will permit the supply and demand mechanism to normalize, according to a spokesman for the Specialty Steel Industry of North America (SSINA). "By more closely reflecting the true cost, the chaotic, wide pricing distortions in the marketplace which began with the 1998 import surge should ease," explained industry spokesman Bert Delano.

James F. Will, Chairman of the Specialty Steel Industry of North America (SSINA), and Chairman, President and CEO of Armco Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, one of the petitioners, said, "We are pleased with the results. Dumped and subsidized imports have injured a competitive and efficient U.S. industry and caused worker lay-offs. We will continue our aggressive campaign against unfairly traded and illegal imports."

Thursday's announcement resulted from unfair trade petitions filed with the U.S. government on June 10, 1998, by four U.S. producers of stainless steel sheet and strip in coils, the United Steelworkers of America (USWA), and two independent unions. The petitions charged France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan and the United Kingdom with "dumping" and requested that antidumping duties be imposed. Simultaneous countervailing duty (CVD) petitions alleging long-standing and extensive government subsidization were filed against France, Italy and South Korea.

The final antidumping duties and CVD rates by country and company follow:

Antidumping Duty Margins

Nation/Producer(s)

Antidumping Duty Margins (%)

France

Usinor Sacilor

10.64

All Others

10.64

 

Germany

Krupp Thyssen Nirosta GmbH ("KTN")

25.82

All Others

25.82

 

Italy

Acciai Speciali Terni ("AST")

11.17

Arinox SRL

11.17

All Others

11.17

 

Japan

Nippon Steel Corporation SpA ("NSC")

57.87

Kawaski Steel Corporation ("KSC")

37.13

Nippon Metal Industries

57.87

Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.

57.87

Nippon Yakin Kogyo

57.87

All Others

37.13

 

Mexico

Mexinox S.A. de C.V.

30.86

All Others

30.86

 

South Korea

Pohang Iron & Steel Co. ("POSCO")

12.12

Inchon Iron & Steel Co.

- 0 -

Taihan Electric Wire Co., Ltd.

58.79

Dai-Yang

12.12

Sammi Steel Company

12.12

All Others

12.12

 

Taiwan

Yieh United ("YUSCO")

34.95

YUSCO/Ta Chen

34.95

Tung Mung Development Co., Ltd./Tachen

14.95

Tung Mung

14.95

Chang Mien Industries Co., Ltd.

.98

All Others

12.60

 

United Kingdom

Avesta Sheffield Ltd.

14.84

All Others

14.84

 

 

Countervailing Duty Rates

Nation/Producer(s)

CVD Rates

France

Ugine division of Usinor S.A.

5.38

All Others

5.38

 

Italy

Acciai Speciali Terni SpA

12.22

Arinox SrL

1.03

All Others

12.09

 

South Korea

Pohang Iron and Steel Company (POSCO)

0.65

Sammi Steel Company

59.30

Inchon Iron and Steel Company

2.64

DaiYang Metal Co., Ltd.

1.58

Taihan

7.00

All Others

1.68

In addition, Commerce determined that illegal imports from YUSCO and Ta Chen in Taiwan; Nippon Metal Industries, Nippon Steel Corporation, Nippon Yakin Kogyo and Nisshin in Japan; and Taihan and Dai-Yang in South Korea meet the test of "critical circumstances." A finding of "critical circumstances" backdates the suspension of liquidation by 90 days, thus capturing an additional few months worth of imports.

Based on the preliminary margins determined in November, 1998 (countervailing duty) and January, 1999 (antidumping), importers have had to post bonds to assure payment of the duties. The final decisions raised the margins significantly against Taiwanese, Italian, Korean and Mexican producers, and generally maintained the earlier findings against other countries.

The payment of duties in cash begins after the International Trade Commission (ITC) determines whether the industry has been injured or threatened with material injury. The ITC decision occurs within 45 days after Commerce announces final margins. If the ITC determines that injury has occurred, Commerce then notifies the Customs Service to begin collection from the importers cash deposits in the amount of the duties.

Stainless steel sheet and strip in coils is the industry's largest product line. In 1998, the target countries accounted for 80% of the total import tonnage of these products. Their value was $450 million. The product has many uses, including in automobiles, consumer appliances, building and construction, and a host of other applications.

The petitioners in the antidumping and countervailing duty cases are ATI Allegheny Ludlum, Armco Inc. (not a petitioner in the Mexico case), and J&L Specialty Steel, Inc. (not a petitioner in the France case), all headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA; and Washington Steel division of Bethlehem Steel Corporation (recently partially shut down and partially sold). USWA, Butler Armco Independent Union and Zanesville Armco Independent Organization, Inc., joined the companies as petitioners in the unfair trade actions.

The companies are members of the Specialty Steel Industry of North America (SSINA), a Washington, D.C.-based trade association representing virtually all continental producers of stainless and alloy tool steels, electrical steels, super alloys and other high technology metals.

The USWA represents 750,000 members in the United States and Canada employed in the primary and secondary metals industries.

David A. Hartquist, an international trade attorney with the Washington, D.C. law firm of Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott, pllc, serves as lead counsel to SSINA.